NECC, San Diego, CA ., July 6, 2006
Following Last Years One Hour Session (found here),
You will create a "hands-on" powerpoint
presentation
(after de-constructing this
template from the Microsoft Office Template Gallery)
to demonstrate answers to the following questions.
TEN Essential
Questions of Multimedia
Creating a PowerPoint for Understanding, Retention, and Application
Are students:
1) Shown examples
of both poor and well crafted presentations?
2) Given a checklist
of technology literacy and a checklist for design skills before starting
the project?
(Example from http://pblmm.k12.ca.us/)
|
Page (s) |
Content |
|
1 |
TEN Essential Questions of Multimedia |
|
2 - 4 |
1. Atkin Mayer, Richard E., Mr. “The Cognitive Load of PowerPoint: Q&A with Richard E. Mayer.” Interview with Cliff Atkinson. sociable media. 1 June 2004. sociablemedia.com. 29 June 2006 <http://www.sociablemedia.com/articles_mayer.htm>. |
|
5-7 |
2. Roblyer, M D. “Our Multimedia Future.” Learning & Leading with Technology Mar. 1999: 51-53. 29 June 2006 <http://www.iste.org/Content/NavigationMenu/Publications/LL/LLIssues/Volume_26_1998_1999_/March7/March_1999.htm>. |
|
8-11 |
3. Simons, Tad. “The multimedia paradox.” Presentations (Sept. 2004): 1-4. 29 June 2006 <http://www.presentations.com/presentations/search/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000734183>. |
|
12-14 |
4. Burmark, Lynell,
Dr. Enhancing Multimedia Presentations. |
|
15 |
Essential Questions: What is Snow? |
|
16 |
Strategies for Comparing/Contrasting: Identifying_similarities_and_differences |
|
17-21 |
5. Varlas,
Laura. “Getting Acquainted with the Essential Nine.” Nine Essential
Instructional Strategies. Winter 2002. The MiddleWeb Listserv. 29 June 2006 <http://www.middleweb.com/MWLresources/marzchat1.html |
|
22 |
Microsoft Educational Templates |
|
23-28 |
6. “Raising
Student Achievement with Technology.” Apple - Education - Research.
Spring 2006. Apple.com. 29 June 2006 <http://www.apple.com/education/research/> |
|
29-31 |
7. Boster, Franklin J., et al. “A Report on the Effect of the Unitedstreaming(TM) Application on Educational Performance.” CARET (Center for Applied Research in Educational Technology). CARET. 29 June 2006 <http://caret.iste.org/> |
|
32 |
Additional Resources: Digital Storytelling Examples |
|
33-34 |
Additional Resources: PhotoStory3, Producer, and Movie Maker |
|
35 |
NECC 2006 Conference Website |
Research Listings
The Cognitive Load of Powerpoint: Q&A with Richard E. Mayer by Cliff Atkinson
Scoring Power Points by Jamie McKenzie (FNO)
Multimedia Projects WebSite
Book
Scoring Rubric
Enhancing
Multimedia Presentations
"Humans process visuals 66,000 times faster than text!"
Instructional
Strategies that Work, Marzano
Identifying Similarities and Differences
Powerpoint Checklist
http://www.c2p2online.com/documents/PowerpointGuidelinesforSpeakers.pdf
classroomhelp.com/lessons/cclark/Trekkers/ppchecklist.htm
UnitedStreaming Full Report (72 pages)
UnitedStreaming Summary (3 pages) from CARET.Iste.org
Math Report
Our Multimedia Future From ISTE (c) 1999
Impact of Technology on Student Achievement (Summary of ACOT Findings)
Microsoft Office Template Sites
State
Report Template
Microsoft Template Gallery for Education
Dowload the "Learning Essentials" with many additional templates
Research Websites for Workshop
Graphics Websites for Workshop
picsearch.com
google.com
ditto.com
altavista.com
MorgueFile
Example Checklist Choices for the Microsoft Office
Template Our 50 States
A Editing Skills
|
|
Title Slide contains an
Essential Question |
|
|
Evidence of clear planning
through a storyboard (Inspiration) was submitted |
|
|
Each slide contains a clear
heading |
|
|
All spoken text has been
researched and edited and is viewable in the notes view area |
|
|
Conferred with my teacher
to make revisions and corrections |
|
|
Contains proper citations
and copyright information |
|
|
At least one graphic per
slide. Graphics may include: digital
camera images, clipart or animated images, or Internet graphics |
|
|
Map of location, state or
other geography |
|
|
Drawing tools used to call
attention to map points, or other elements in the slideshow |
|
|
Graph, or Organizational
Chart (using solid, not fill, colors) |
|
|
Movie from Discovery
Learning |
|
|
Hyperlink to Brainpop or National Geographic Explorer |
|
|
Sounds, Music, Narration as
appropriate for content |
C Design Considerations
|
Text/Font. If you find it necessary to include text on
a slide, follow these rules: |
|
|
|
Followed the 5 by 5 rule maximum.
Five lines of text, five words per line. |
|
|
Easy to read |
|
|
Appropriate for
presentation |
|
|
Size for Title slides is 40
point minimum |
|
|
Appropriate color with
background |
|
Graphics |
|
|
|
Appropriate for slide |
|
|
Clear not blurry |
|
|
Proportionally sized |
|
|
Enhances presentation |
|
|
Tried to use photographs,
instead of clipart when possible |
|
|
Avoid placing saturated
primary colors (red, green or blue) adjacent to each other |
|
SlideShow Design |
|
|
|
Background enhances each
slide |
|
|
Backgrounds follow the same
color range |
|
|
Comparison Contrast Layout
is used when possible |
|
|
Few transitions, of limited
distraction, are used |
|
|
Titles appear before other
elements of the slide |
D Presentation Considerations
|
|
Practiced delivery of the
presentation in a conversational style |
|
|
Given the audience
opportunities to take notes |
Richard
Mayer’s Multimedia
Principle
(in which people learn
better from words and pictures than from words alone)
_____
Signaling Principle, in which people
learn better when the material is organized with clear outlines and headings
_____ Personalization
Principle, in which people learn better from a conversational style
rather than a formal style.
_____
Coherence Principle, in which
people learn better when extraneous material is excluded rather than included
_____
Contiguity Principle, in
which people learn better when corresponding words and pictures are presented
at the same time or next to each other on the same screen
_____ Modality Principle, in which people learn better from
animation (graphics) with spoken text than animation with printed text
Multimedia Project Scoring Rubric:
Scoring Guidelines
|
Score Levels |
Multimedia |
Collaboration |
Content |
Presentation |
|
5 |
Students have used
multimedia in creative and effective ways that exploit the particular
strengths of the chosen format. All elements make a contribution. There are
few technical problems, and none of a serious nature. |
Students were a
very effective team. Division of responsibilities capitalized on the
strengths of each team member. The final product was shaped by all members
and represents something that would not have been possible to accomplish
working alone. |
Meets all criteria
of the previous level and one or more of the following: reflects broad
research and application of critical thinking skills; shows notable insight
or understanding of the topic; compels the audience's attention. |
Delivery is smooth,
engaging, conversational in style, questioning strategies are used with the
audience, and eye contact is regularly maintained. Rehearsal is evident. |
|
4 |
Presentation blends
3 or more multimedia elements in a balanced, attractive, easy-to-follow
format. Elements include original student work. With minor exceptions, all
elements contribute rather than detract from the presentation's overall
effectiveness. |
Students worked
together as a team on all aspects of the project. There was an effort to
assign roles based on the skills/talents of individual members. All members
strove to fulfill their responsibilities. |
The project has a
clear goal related to a significant topic or issue. Information included has
been compiled from several relevant sources. The project is useful to an
audience beyond the students who created it. |
Delivery is smooth,
engaging, mostly conversational in style, questioning strategies are rarely
used with the audience, and eye contact is normal. Rehearsal is evident. |
|
3 |
Presentation uses 2
or more media. There are some technical problems, but the viewer is able to
follow the presentation with few difficulties. |
Students worked
together on the project as a team with defined roles to play. Most members
fulfilled their responsibilities. Disagreements were resolved or managed
productively. |
The project
presents information in an accurate and organized manner that can be
understood by the intended audience. There is a focus that is maintained
throughout the piece. |
Delivery is smooth
and somewhat engaging, questioning strategies are not used with the audience,
and eye contact is irregular.
Rehearsal is questionable. |
|
2 |
Presentation uses 2
or more media, but technical difficulties seriously interfere with the
viewer's ability to see, hear, or understand content. |
Presentation is the
result of a group effort, but only some members of the group contributed.
There is evidence of poor communication, unresolved conflict, or failure to
collaborate on important aspects of the work. |
The project has a
focus but may stray from it at times. There is an organizational structure,
though it may not be carried through consistently. There may be factual
errors or inconsistencies, but they are relatively minor. |
Delivery is not
smooth but somewhat engaging, questioning strategies are not used with the
audience, and eye contact is rare.
Rehearsal is questionable. |
|
1 |
Multimedia is
absent from the presentation. |
Presentation was
created by one student working more or less alone (though may have received
guidance or help from others). |
Project seems
haphazard, hurried or unfinished. There are significant factual errors,
misconceptions, or misunderstandings. |
Delivery not
smooth, engaging, or conversational in style.
Eye contact is rare. There was
probably no rehearsal. |
|
|
Multimedia score = |
Collaboration
score = |
Content score = |
Presentation
score = |
Number of times visited since June 30, 2006
Last updated June 30,
2006
Barry Haines / Barry@Haines.net